<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <channel>
        <atom:link href="http://moviejunkie.yolasite.com/300.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
        <title>300</title>
        <description>300</description>
        <link>http://moviejunkie.yolasite.com/300.php</link>
        <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2026 23:21:40 +0100</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>FeedCreator 1.7.2</generator>
        <item>
            <title>300</title>
            <link>http://moviejunkie.yolasite.com/300/300</link>
            <description>&lt;FONT style=&quot;FONT-FAMILY: ; FONT-SIZE: 17px&quot;&gt;Madness? This...is...OVERRATED!!!!&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;FONT style=&quot;FONT-SIZE: 15px&quot;&gt;Like your blood digital and unrealistic? Like your slow motion to be constant? Like your story to be inconsistent? Then &quot;300&quot; is your kind of movie! Why is this one of the most popular graphic novel adaptations of all time? Either I mised the point or people forget what it takes to make a successful movie.All I can tell is that &quot;300&quot; did not live up to what it was supposed to be.It's a hyper-violent and digital bloodfest that lacks that spark that usually makes director Zach Snyder's films such great spectacles.When I say 'digital bloodfest', you have no idea how un-realistic and un-convincing the blood looks.Pretty much about 95% of it is CG blood, and what a riot it is to NOT be convinced by such fakeness! What a shame, I even found Snyder's &quot;Dawn of the Dead&quot; remake filled with more convincing scenes, not to mention an actual story and character development.There's not much to talk about &quot;300&quot;&amp;nbsp;when it comes to story, given that it's centered on 300 spartan warriors who kill lots and lots and LOTS of persians.You call that a story? As for interesting characters, the only would is Leonadis played by Gerard Butler, who's backstory when he was a child is pretty much the closest thing to character development that this movie has to offer.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Excuse me if it sounds like I'm hating on this movie when I'm just getting the bad things out of the way.With that said, I must give credit to Snyder for making a well-shot and good looking movie that features some well-handlede battle sequences.Unfortantly, the battle scenes are boggled down by unconvincing gore effects and the over-use of slow motion.Slo-mo was cool in 1999 when the original &quot;Matrix&quot; was released, but now it's starting to becoming just as much of a gimmick like the use of 3-D.In my opinion, I find &quot;300&quot; to be the weakest of Snyder's movies.Yes, I found the poorly reviewed &quot;Sucker Punch&quot; to be more entertaining, WAY more entertaining! Let's be clear about this and say that I didn't dislike &quot;300&quot;.I was moderatly entertained, but that wasn't enough for me.If anything, this movie makes for a fun 2 hours when you have NOTHING to do.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;&lt;FONT style=&quot;FONT-FAMILY: ; FONT-SIZE: 21px&quot;&gt;Grade: B-&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;</description>
            <pubDate>Sat, 07 May 2011 17:36:42 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
    </channel>
</rss>
