<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <channel>
        <atom:link href="http://moviejunkie.yolasite.com/let-me-in.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
        <title>let-me-in</title>
        <description>let-me-in</description>
        <link>http://moviejunkie.yolasite.com/let-me-in.php</link>
        <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2026 23:31:57 +0100</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>FeedCreator 1.7.2</generator>
        <item>
            <title>Let Me In</title>
            <link>http://moviejunkie.yolasite.com/let-me-in/let-me-in</link>
            <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT style=&quot;FONT-SIZE: 18px; FONT-FAMILY: &quot;&gt;&quot;Twilight&quot; just got it's ass kicked.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;&lt;FONT style=&quot;FONT-SIZE: 14px; FONT-FAMILY: &quot;&gt;&quot;Let Me In&quot; is an American remake of a Swedish horror movie called &quot;Let The Right One In&quot;, another original movie that I haven't seen.Those looking for a movie better than the original, I dunno, may find themselves thinking the remake was unnecessary, but that's the thing with almost every remake that comes out.Take &quot;Halloween&quot;, &quot;Friday The 13th&quot;, &quot;Texas Chainsaw Massacre&quot;, and who could forget &quot;A Nightmare On Elm Streets&quot;? Matt Reeves, the director of the hugely entertaing &quot;Cloverfield&quot;, actually delivers a remake that doesn't rely on typical blood splatter and nudity to entertain, and that's a rare thing to find in Hollywood remakes of original classics.While not the best vampire movie ever, &quot;Let Me In&quot; is a solid and effective take on the vampire genre and actually gives a pretty decent love story.Forget about &quot;Twilight&quot;, THIS is how to mix vampires and romance together the RIGHT way.What keeps the movie going in the right direction is mainly the story, which revolves around a 12-year old boy who finds himself in love with his new neighbor, who's secretly a vampire.She's played by Chloe Grace Moretz, who doesn't exactly give as strong a performance as in &quot;Kick-Ass&quot; as Hit Girl, but she deserves at least a little attention for her strong performance as a blood-thirsty vampire.There is a one thing I didn't like too much about &quot;Let Me In&quot;, the emotion.It's not the fact that the movie tried to be emotional in some scenes, it's the fact that watching these parts didn't give me the feeling that I was watching a vampire movie.Sometimes it felt like an ordinary drama, then it moved into a vampire flick, but who said that was a bad thing? Most vampire movies require a little substance to be more than just vampire flick and not just an average gore-fest, and I think Reeve's definetly did a good thing by not relying on gore for entertainment.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Is &quot;Let Me In&quot; as good as Matt Reeve's &quot;Cloverfield&quot; ? Hell to the no! While not as viciously entertaining as &quot;Cloverfield&quot;, &quot;Let Me In&quot; is a solid take on the vampire genre.It's a little overlong and the touchy feelings and emotions kind of change the mood from vampire to drama, but the story and performances keep it from being as gay as &quot;Twilight&quot;, and that's something to be thankful for.Kristen Stewart, get your pale tail out of dodge, Chloe Grace Moretz is the WAY better actress.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;&lt;FONT style=&quot;FONT-SIZE: 20px; FONT-FAMILY: &quot;&gt;Grade: B+&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
            <pubDate>Fri, 11 Feb 2011 20:29:30 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
    </channel>
</rss>
